AI can help QA teams cover more interactions, spot issues sooner, and coach with clearer evidence instead of guesswork.
The challenge is that AI only delivers those gains when the foundations are in place. Data, process, alignment, and trust all matter. Without that readiness, it is easy to spend time on pilots that stall or initiatives that do not scale.
Here you’ll find two practical resources to help you assess readiness, identify what could slow you down, and take the right next step.
Many QA and CX leaders are being asked to “do something with AI” before there is a shared definition of what ready looks like.
That is where projects wobble. Teams end up debating the basics: Do we trust the inputs? Do we have consistency? Can we align stakeholders? Can we scale without creating risk or rework?
The AI Readiness Assessment helps you get a clear view of where you stand, so you can move forward with fewer assumptions.
If you are wondering where to start, start small and get specific.
A quick assessment built for QA and CX leaders who want a clear, practical starting point.
What you will get:
A readiness result you can share internally
The most likely blockers for your situation
Clear direction on what to focus on next
A guide you can use as a reference, a planning tool, or a shared framework across teams.
Inside, you will find:
A simple readiness model to align on
Common blockers with practical actions
A short roadmap, plus tools and templates to support execution
The gap is already visible. 44% of contact centers say automated and real-time QA is the number one change they want, yet 40% are not using AI in QA at all.
Even when AI is on the roadmap, the same blockers show up again and again:
The longer those issues stay unresolved, the longer QA stays constrained by manual effort and slow change.
If you want AI to work in QA, clarity beats confidence.
Start by understanding your readiness. Then focus on the few moves that unlock progress.
A small, in-person breakfast briefing for QA and CX leaders to compare notes on scaling AI, building trust, and moving from limited coverage to meaningful insight.